Energy security and climate change concerns:Triggers for energy policy change in the United States?

Why is it so difficult to change the energy policy status quo away from dependence on fossil fuels when the need to become less dependent on imported oil seems to be generally accepted by U.S. politicians? In recent energy debates in the House and Senate, references to climate change and energy security were frequently used as a rationale for the need for energy policy change. But policymakers were not in agreement about what policy programs would be the best alternative or what goals the programs were to achieve in terms of addressing energy security or climate change, or both at the same time. The paper explores whether putting energy security and climate change on the decision making agenda simultaneously helped craft a political compromise in the 110th Congress – the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, and points out how the political institutions of the United States structured interaction and affected policy outcome, and ultimately the chance of changing the energy policy status quo.

Reference

Bang, Guri, 2010. Energy security and climate change concerns:Triggers for energy policy change in the United States?. Energy Policy, 38 (4): pp. 1645-1653.

More details

  • Language: Engelsk
  • Category: Tidsskriftartikler
  • Title: Energy security and climate change concerns:Triggers for energy policy change in the United States?
  • Journal: Energy Policy
  • Volume: 38
  • Number: 4
  • Pages (from-to): 1645-1653

Last updated: 02.01.06

Downloads

  • Download Reference (RIS Import Format for Reference Manager, EndNote Plus etc.)

Authors

CICERO
CICERO, P.O. Box. 1129 Blindern,
N-0318 Oslo, NORWAY
Visiting adress: Gaustadalléen 21, 0349 OSLO
Editor:
Christian Bjørnæs
Web editor:
Eilif Ursin Reed
Phone:
+47 22 85 87 50
E-mail:
post@cicero.oslo.no>